Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study
Summary
The Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) is a research study for men who have chosen active surveillance as a management plan for their prostate cancer. Active surveillance is defined as close monitoring of prostate cancer with the offer of treatment if there are changes in test results. This study seeks to discover markers that will identify cancers that are more aggressive from those tumors that grow slowly.
Detailed description
This is a multi-center, prospective active surveillance study with selective intervention in patients with previously untreated, clinically localized prostate cancer at diagnosis. Candidates are assessed based on an extended core biopsy, serum PSA (including PSA kinetics, if available), digital rectal examination (DRE), and assessment of cancer grade and extent. Active surveillance is defined as serial PSA measurements and prostate examination with routine prostate biopsy and therapeutic intervention considered at the time one or more of the following: * Grade or volume progression * Clinical progression The objectives of the study are as follows: Primary Objective • To discover and confirm biomarkers that predict aggressive disease as defined by pre-specified histological, PSA, clinical criteria, or outcomes based on these variables. Secondary Objectives * To determine the proportion of patients on active surveillance who progress based on the above criteria. * To determine the clinical predictors of disease progression. * To measure the recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival of men on active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (10)
Veterans Affairs San Francisco Health Care System
San Francisco, California, 94121
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System
Seattle, Washington, 98108
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
References
- Warlick CA, Allaf ME, Carter HB. Expectant treatment with curative intent in the prostate-specific antigen era: triggers for definitive therapy. Urol Oncol. 2006 Jan-Feb;24(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.07.004.(PubMed)
- Carter HB, Walsh PC, Landis P, Epstein JI. Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results. J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1231-4.(PubMed)
- Hardie C, Parker C, Norman A, Eeles R, Horwich A, Huddart R, Dearnaley D. Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):956-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05446.x.(PubMed)
- Klotz L. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2006 Jan-Feb;24(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.07.002.(PubMed)
- Meng MV, Elkin EP, Harlan SR, Mehta SS, Lubeck DP, Carroll PR. Predictors of treatment after initial surveillance in men with prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2279-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000094190.46523.b2.(PubMed)
- Patel MI, DeConcini DT, Lopez-Corona E, Ohori M, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. An analysis of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who deferred definitive therapy. J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1520-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118224.54949.78.(PubMed)
- Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, de Vries SH, Wolters T, Gosselaar C, van Leenders GJ, Schroder FH. Active surveillance for prostate cancers detected in three subsequent rounds of a screening trial: characteristics, PSA doubling times, and outcome. Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1244-50; discussion 1251. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.053. Epub 2006 Dec 5.(PubMed)
- Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Wheeler TM, Maru N, Scardino PT, Erbersdobler A, Graefen M, Huland H, Koh H, Shariat S, Slawin KM, Ohori M. Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1792-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091806.70171.41.(PubMed)
- Steyerberg EW, Roobol MJ, Kattan MW, van der Kwast TH, de Koning HJ, Schroder FH. Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):107-12; discussion 112. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.068.(PubMed)
- Chappidi MR, Newcomb LF, Zheng Y, Liu M, Schenk JM, Zhu K, de la Calle CM, Brooks JD, Carroll PR, Dash A, Filson CP, Gleave ME, Liss MA, Martin F, McKenney JK, Morgan TM, Wagner AA, Nelson PS, Lin DW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Second Surveillance Biopsy After Diagnosis in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study. J Urol. 2025 Sep;214(3):251-258. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004592. Epub 2025 Apr 30.(PubMed)