Office Based MRI/Ultrasound Guided Prostate Cryotherapy: Outcomes Registry
Summary
Registration of Prostate Cancer patients undergoing Prostate Cryotherapy guided by Mutiparametric-MRI (MP-MRI) highlighting biopsy confirmed regions. The primary outcome measure is 5 year oncological control. Secondary aim is lack of progression beyond the prostate gland. The aim of intervention is to eradicate prostate cancer disease in the treated area while imposing no or minimal deleterious effects in quality of life.
Detailed description
CLINICAL TRIAL OF OBSERVATION NATURE PRIMARY OUTCOME Cancer control of treated areas 5, 10, 15 years after intervention based on prostate biopsy of initial treated area, progression requiring conversion to radical prostate surgery or radiation or other forms of whole gland treatment (ej, HIFU), Metastatic Free survival: CT Scan and Bone Scans, Cancer-Specific and Overall Survival SECONDARY OUTCOMES Secondary Interventions focal interventions due to de-novo lesions. Focal or target therapy rescue with other technologies (ej HIFU); Short, Intermediate and Long-Term Urinary and Sexual Function changes in quality of life measured by validated inventories; Anxiety related to cancer and cancer control. Treatment tolerance to local anesthesia. Patient App compliance and activity to monitor care DATA COLLECTION * Complete H\&P, family history, past medical and surgical history, social history, allergies, and medications * As of July 2016, voluntary measurement thru Focalyx App for smartphones and tablets * Imaging Specifics Assessing Prostate, Seminal Vesicles and Urethral Contouring by Multi-parametric-MRI. Dominant lesions and secondary lesions contouring my MP-MRI. * Procedure specific Co-Registration quality with ultrasound denoting quality * Specific ablative description and digitalization of critical measures such as: ablation type (ej cryotherapy, equipment used) procedure, cryoprobes used, freeze/thaw cycles timing, temperatures at neurovascular bundles, denonvilliers fascia. Urethral warmer requirements * Follow up information: 30 day perioperative outcomes (incidence of UTI, urinary retention, failure of local anesthetic, pain measures). 6 week, 3,6,9,12 month and then every 6 month measures of PSA, Testosterone levels, Urinary Function and Sexual Function inventories, Overall anxiety and regret related to diagnosis and treatment * Uroflow and PVR measurements by 3 to 6 month of treatment * MP MRI on a yearly basis, for years 2,3,4 after treatment, biopsy driven by new suspicious MRI findings * MP MRI triggered by elevation in PSA velocity or PSA level 10% above diagnosis * Transperineal Fusion Guided Prostate biopsy at 1st year - emphasis on treated areas, suspicious MRI areas * Transperineal Fusion Guided Prostate biopsy at 5th year - emphasis on treated areas, suspicious MRI areas * 5, 10, 15 Yr CT Scans, PET Scan/Bone Scan SAFETY MEASURES * Periodic evaluation of registry to ensure consistency in follow up * Patient remainders of tests required
Arms & interventions
- ProcedureFUSE IMAGE MRI GUIDED PROSTATE CRYOTHERAPY
Biopsy proven Prostate Cancer is delimited and defined by MP-MRI. The MRI study is fused with transrectal ultrasound in realtime. The cryogenic "cryoprobes/devices" are employed to freeze and all "circuled or noted" cancer lesions. Two freeze 8 min/ thaw 10 min clycles are performed. Thermocouples are used to monitor treatment areas and safety margins
Outcome measures
Primary
Oncological Control
Lack of prostate cancer presence in treated area after MRI/US FUSION Biopsy
Time frame: 1 Year
Secondary
Oncological Control
Time frame: 1 Year
Oncological Control
Time frame: Yearly, up to 10 years
Urinary Functional Outcomes
Time frame: Every 3 months up to 24 months
Perioperative Outcomes
Time frame: 30 days
Sexual Functional Outcomes
Time frame: Every 3 months up to 24 months
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Urological Research Network
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016
References
- Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, Emberton M, Futterer JJ, Gill IS, Grubb Iii RL, Hadaschik B, Klotz L, Margolis DJ, Marks LS, Melamed J, Oto A, Palmer SL, Pinto P, Puech P, Punwani S, Rosenkrantz AB, Schoots IG, Simon R, Taneja SS, Turkbey B, Ukimura O, van der Meulen J, Villers A, Watanabe Y; START Consortium. Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Mar 20.(PubMed)
- Bahn D, de Castro Abreu AL, Gill IS, Hung AJ, Silverman P, Gross ME, Lieskovsky G, Ukimura O. Focal cryotherapy for clinically unilateral, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in 73 men with a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Mar 21.(PubMed)
- Costa DN, Pedrosa I, Donato F Jr, Roehrborn CG, Rofsky NM. MR Imaging-Transrectal US Fusion for Targeted Prostate Biopsies: Implications for Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):696-708. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140058. Epub 2015 Mar 18.(PubMed)
- Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ; European Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y. Epub 2012 Feb 10.(PubMed)
- Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM, Merino MJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942.(PubMed)