Image Guided VATS Resection vs. VATS Resection of Lung Lesions
Summary
To evaluate workflow and outcomes of iVATS and standard VATS for small pulmonary nodules. The outcomes of the patients will be evaluated separately as there will be no direct comparison of the two arms.
Detailed description
This is a prospective phase II clinical study to evaluate iVATS and standard VATS for small pulmonary nodules. We have successfully completed and published a phase I/pilot study with 25 patients demonstrating safety and optimal procedural workflow for combining image-guidance with VATS. This phase II clinical study will further expand upon the safety and feasibility of this procedure. Additionally, this data will be used to design a phase III comparison study between iVATS and standard VATS.
Arms & interventions
- DeviceImage guided Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) resection
Image guided placement of a fiducial consisting of a needle directed placement of a T-Bar next to the target lesion in order to lead the surgeon to the lung region to be removed
- ProcedureVideo-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Standard of Care Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) resection
Outcome measures
Primary
Operating Room Time
The time (in min.) from incision to close
Time frame: 3 years to complete
Secondary
Time to T-bar placement
Time frame: 3 years
Time for induction to incision
Time frame: 3 years
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: 3 years
Radiation Exposure
Time frame: 3 years
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
References
- Gill RR, Zheng Y, Barlow JS, Jayender J, Girard EE, Hartigan PM, Chirieac LR, Belle-King CJ, Murray K, Sears C, Wee JO, Jaklitsch MT, Colson YL, Bueno R. Image-guided video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (iVATS) - phase I-II clinical trial. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;112(1):18-25. doi: 10.1002/jso.23941. Epub 2015 May 28.(PubMed)