Venetoclax to Improve Outcomes of Fractionated Busulfan Regimen in Patients With High-Risk AML and MDS
Summary
This phase II trial studies the effect of venetoclax together with busulfan, cladribine, and fludarabine in treating patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who are undergoing stem cell transplant. Chemotherapy drugs, such as venetoclax, busulfan, cladribine, and fludarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding venetoclax to the current standard of care stem cell transplant regimen of busulfan, fludarabine, and cladribine may help to control high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Detailed description
Phase 2 Portion Primary Objective 1) To obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy as defined by 1-year progression free survival. Secondary Objectives To determine: 1. Safety of this regimen as per NCI toxicity criteria 2. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment 3. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD 4. Relapse incidence 5. Non-relapse mortality 6. Overall survival 7. Graft versus host disease-relapse free survival (GRFS) Phase 3 Portion Primary Objective 1\) To compare progression free survival between two arms Arm 1 Standard of Care: fludarabine + IV busulfan (FluBu) versus Arm 2 Experimental: Venetoclax + Fractionated busulfan, cladribine, and fludarabine Secondary Objectives To compare following between two arms 1. Safety of this regimen as per NCI toxicity criteria 2. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment 3. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD 4. Relapse incidence 5. Non-relapse mortality 6. Overall survival 7. Graft versus host disease-relapse free survival (GRFS)
Arms & interventions
- DrugBusulfan
Given IV
- DrugCladribine
Given IV
- DrugFludarabine Phosphate
Given IV
- ProcedureHematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Undergo stem cell transplantation
- DrugThiotepa
Given IV
- DrugVenetoclax
Given PO
Outcome measures
Primary
1-year progression free survival (PFS)
The proportion of patients who are alive without disease relapse (PFS) at one year will be reported along with the corresponding 95% credible interval. Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to assess the association between PFS and clinical and treatment covariates of interest.
Time frame: At 1 year post-transplant
Secondary
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-transplant
Graft-versus (vs.)-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS)
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-transplant
Time to platelet engraftment
Time frame: From the time of transplant up to 3 years
Time to neutrophil engraftment
Time frame: From the time of transplant up to 3 years
Incidence of acute and chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD)
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-transplant
Incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-transplant
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-transplant
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030