Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Nipocalimab Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab compared to placebo in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). The purpose of the subcutaneous substudy is to evaluate how well it works in the body (pharmacodynamic \[PD\]) when given as an injection under the skin (subcutaneous) compared to when given through a vein (intravenous) in participants with gMG.
Arms & interventions
- DrugNipocalimab
Nipocalimab will be administered as an IV infusion.
- DrugPlacebo
Matching placebo will be administered as an IV infusion.
- DrugNipocalimab SC-LIV
Nipocalimab will be administered subcutaneously.
Outcome measures
Primary
Double-blind (DB) Phase: Average Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total Score Over Weeks 22, 23, and 24
Average change from baseline over multiple timepoints (Weeks 22, 23, and 24) was reported in this outcome measure. The MG-ADL provided a rapid assessment of the participant's MG symptom severity of eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, eyelid droop) rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). MG-ADL total score was sum of 8 individual items, which ranging from 0 to 24. A higher score indicated greater symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Day 1 total scores.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 22, 23, and 24
Sub Study: Percent Change in Anti-AChR Autoantibody Titer From Pre-first Nipocalimab Dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Percent Change in Total IgG Levels From Pre-first Nipocalimab Dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Secondary
DB Phase: Average Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over Weeks 22 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 22, and 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Had Achieved at Least a 2-point Average Improvement From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total Score Over Weeks 22, 23, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 22, 23, and 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Had Achieved an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points in the Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total Score at Week 1 and/or Week 2
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Had an Improvement of >= 2 Points in the MG-ADL Total Score From Week 4 Through Week 24 With no More Than 2 Non-consecutive Excursions Allowed Between Weeks 6 Through 23
Time frame: From Week 4 up to Week 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Had Achieved at Least a 50 Percent (%) Average Improvement From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total Score Over Weeks 22, 23, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 22, 23, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: From start of treatment (DB phase Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From start of treatment (DB phase Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Percentage of Participants With AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time frame: From start of treatment (DB phase Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Number of Participants With Change in Vital Signs
Time frame: From start of treatment (DB phase Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Laboratory Values
Time frame: From start of treatment (DB phase Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Had an Improvement of >= 3 Points in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score From Baseline, at Week 2 Through Week 24, With No More Than 2 Non-consecutive Excursions Allowed Between at Weeks 4 Through Week 22
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 up to Week 24
DB Phase: Average Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Items of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Fatigue Scale Total Score Over Weeks 22 and 24
Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 22, and 24
DB Phase: Average Change From Baseline in the Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (Revised) Instrument (MG-Qol15r) Score Over Weeks 22 And 24
Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 22, and 24
DB Phase: Change From Baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score of European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Phase: Change From Baseline in the Health Status Index of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants With Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score of 0 or 1 Over Time
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants With Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score of 0 or 1 at Any Time
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants With Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score of 0 or 1 at 50% of Timepoints
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
DB Phase: Percentage of Participants With Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score of 0 or 1 at 75% of Timepoints
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Serum Concentrations of Nipocalimab Over Time
Time frame: DB Phase: Predose and 45 minutes post-dose on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 24;OL Phase: Predose on Day 1, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Number of Participants With Antibodies to Nipocalimab (Anti-Drug Antibodies [ADAs] and Neutralizing Antibodies [NAbs])
Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1) up to 4 years 9 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in Levels of Autoantibodies Associated With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG)
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score as a Function of IgG
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score as a Function of Immunoglobulin G (IgG)
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score as a Response to Percent Change in Autoantibody Levels in Seropositive Participants Treated With Nipocalimab
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in QMG Score as a Response to Percent Change in Autoantibody Levels in Seropositive Participants Treated With Nipocalimab
Time frame: Baseline up to 4 years 9 months
Sub Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical Examinations
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Assessment With SC Use of Nipocalimab
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Number of Participants With Injection Site-Reactions
Time frame: Up to SC Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in MG-ADL Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in QMG Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Clinician-Reported Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in C-SSRS Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in Neuro-QoL Participant-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in MG-QoL Participant-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Participant-Reported Outcome Measures up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1) up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Percent Change in Total IgG Levels From Pre-first Nipocalimab Dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Sub Study: Percent Change in Anti-AChR Autoantibody Titer From Pre-first Nipocalimab Dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Time frame: From pre-first nipocalimab dose on Day 1 up to Week 8 (Day 57)
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (24)
Neuromuscular Research Center and Clinic
Paradise Valley, Arizona, 85028
HonorHealth Neurology
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Care Access Research
Pasadena, California, 91101
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
FM Clinical Research, LLC South Florida Neurology Associates, P. A.
Boca Raton, Florida, 33487
University of Florida Health Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Medsol Clinical Research Center Inc
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912-3125
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
St. Elizabeth Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44145
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Wesley Neurology
Cordova, Tennessee, 38018
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
References
- Yu F, Myshkin E, Nguyen B, Bobadilla Mendez C, Cossu M, Fei K, Wang Q, Hubbard JJ, Campbell K, Ramchandren S, Rojo Cella R, Edwards R, Taylor PC, Gottenberg JE, Noaiseh G, Vu T, Antozzi C, Winthrop KL, Cuff CA, Loza MJ, Dimitrova D, Gao S. Effect of nipocalimab on IgG responses to vaccinations and viral infections in patients with IgG autoantibody-mediated diseases: Post hoc analyses of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2026 Dec;22(1):2664331. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2026.2664331. Epub 2026 May 5.(PubMed)
- Antozzi C, Fitzgibbon M. An evaluation of nipocalimab for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2025 Oct;25(10):1047-1058. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2025.2561935. Epub 2025 Sep 30.(PubMed)
- Raborn A, Savord A, Houts CR, Pease S, Scippa K, Ramchandren S. Psychometric analysis of the Neuro-QoL Fatigue in generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) using data from a phase 3 trial. Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep;34(9):2577-2589. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03998-9. Epub 2025 Jun 14.(PubMed)
- Antozzi C, Vu T, Ramchandren S, Nowak RJ, Farmakidis C, Bril V, De Bleecker J, Yang H, Minks E, Park JS, Grudniak M, Smilowski M, Sevilla T, Hoffmann S, Sivakumar K, Suzuki Y, Youssef E, Sanga P, Karcher K, Zhu Y, Sheehan JJ, Sun H; Vivacity-MG3 Study Group. Safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in adults with generalised myasthenia gravis (Vivacity-MG3): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2025 Feb;24(2):105-116. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00498-8.(PubMed)