Cancerify Logo
Log inSign up
Back to clinical trials
RecruitingObservational

Lesion Composition and Quantitative Imaging Analysis on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT05369546Sponsor: University of HawaiiLast updated: 2023-02-02

Summary

The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. To do this, the investigators have developed an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols to acquire multispectral images to measure the composition of suspicious breast lesions. The central hypothesis is that breast tissue composition in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone.

Detailed description

Women with dense breast have not been shown to benefit by increased cancer detection of volumetric digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) but may benefit by lower recall rates. DBT screening biopsy rates are similar to 2D digital mammography; higher for first screening exams, lower thereafter with adjustment for age and breast density. In the U.S., 71% of biopsies do not result in a breast cancer diagnosis among women ages 40-79 who undergo breast cancer screening. To address the high rate of unnecessary biopsies, an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols has been developed to acquire multispectral images to measure the lipid/water/protein (L/W/P) composition of suspicious breast lesions. Malignant breast tissue has unique L/W/P composition fractions when compared to normal or benign breast tissue. This proposal aims to increase biopsy yield (BI-RADS-PPV3) through combining L/W/P biological biomarkers with quantitative morphological and textural image analysis. This combination of composition and physical descriptions of suspicious breast lesions is called q3CB. The benefits of adding q3CB to the current DBT screening/diagnostic imaging paradigm, that may already include computer aided detection, is not known. This study is designed to compare the expected biopsy yield with and without q3CB in a clinical reader study and explore how q3CB may be combine with existing technologies. The central hypothesis is that biological L/W/P fractions in breast tissue in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone. The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. The investigators rationale for the proposed research is that biological L/W/P descriptions of breast lesions will lead to more specific biopsy decisions and a better understanding of cancer types. Specifically, the project aims are 1) develop q3CB lesion signatures for distinguishing breast cancer lesions from benign lesions, using 600 prospectively-acquired DBT exams of women recommended to undergo biopsy; 2) conduct a clinical reader study to compare radiologists' performance on standard-of-care FFDM or DBT without and with the inclusion of q3CB signatures; 3) Investigate the utility of q3CB lesion signatures in a screening paradigm to improve sensitivity and specificity on CADe-identified suspicious lesions in the tasks of assessing malignancy as well as in associating with their association with cancer subtypes; Exploratory) explore the added sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy DBT in phantom studies that explore lesion size, composition, and breast density. The innovation of this study is the full characterization of lipid/water/protein lesion composition with DBT and how it complements existing computer aided diagnostic programs paired with clinical radiologists providing evidence ready for clinical translation of this unique and emerging technology.

Arms & interventions

  • Diagnostic Testq3CB

    The q3CB/ncCEM/DBT acquisition protocol consists of a combination of DBT volume reconstructions and projection dual-energy mammograms acquired with a clinical contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) protocol, without contrast administration agent.

Outcome measures

Primary

  • Quantify biological composition of lesions

    Quantify the biological composition (lipid/water/protein) of suspicious lesions.

    Time frame: Baseline

  • Quantify morphology of lesions

    Quantify morphology/texture (radiomics) of suspicious lesions.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary

  • Comparison of radiologists' image interpretations with and without q3CB signatures

    Time frame: Baseline

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of readers' responses for the BI-RADs assessment categories

    Time frame: Baseline

Eligibility criteria

Sex: FemaleAge: 20 Years to 85 YearsHealthy volunteers: No
Inclusion Criteria: * Had a recent diagnostic mammogram with a BI-RADS diagnostic score 4 or 5 assigned by a radiologist (BIRADS are standardized mammography assessment categories: 4 is for "Suspicious abnormality", 5 is for "Highly suggestive of malignancy". * Have not had biopsy Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or breast feeding * History of breast cancer or a mastectomy (removal of the breast) with Systemic Therapy (ex. Chemotherapy, hormones and hormone inhibitors, etc.).

Study locations (3)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Inc.

Tampa, Florida, 33612

Recruiting
Emily Research Services Project Coordinator · Contact
Bethany L Niell, MD · Principal Investigator
Dana K Ataya, MD · Principal Investigator

Hawaii Radiology Associates, LTD (East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center)

Hilo, Hawaii, 96720

Recruiting
Scott Grosskreutz, MD · Contact
Scott Grosskreutz, MD · Principal Investigator

The Queen's Medical Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822

Recruiting
Richmond Clinical Research Associate · Contact
Todd Seto, MD · Principal Investigator