A Phase 1 Study of Peposertib (M3814) and Low-Dose Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma and Other Soft Tissue Sarcomas
Summary
This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of combination therapy with liposomal doxorubicin and peposertib in treating patients with sarcoma that has spread from where it first started, to other places in the body (metastatic), or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) and for which no known cure is available (advanced). Doxorubicin is in a class of medications called anthracyclines. Doxorubicin damages the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and may kill cancer cells. It also blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and DNA repair. Liposomal doxorubicin is a form of the anticancer drug doxorubicin that is contained inside very tiny, fat-like particles. Liposomal doxorubicin may have fewer side effects and work better than other forms of the drug. Peposertib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It may also enhance the activity of chemo- and radiotherapy. There is some pre-clinical evidence in animal models that combining peposertib with liposomal doxorubicin can shrink or stabilize certain types of cancer for longer than either drug alone, but it is not known if this will happen in people. Combination therapy with liposomal doxorubicin and peposertib may be effective in treating patients with advanced sarcoma.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of peposertib in combination with low-dose pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (liposomal doxorubicin) as evaluated by the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate at each tested dose level. (Dose Escalation) II. To determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of liposomal doxorubicin and peposertib combination and determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) if identified. (Dose Escalation) III. To obtain a more precise determination of adverse events (e.g. dose limiting toxicities estimate at the selected dose). (Dose Expansion) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the pharmacokinetics of peposertib and liposomal doxorubicin used in combination with each other. (Dose Escalation) II. To estimate the objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 in patients with leiomyosarcoma treated with peposertib and low-dose liposomal doxorubicin. (Dose Expansion) III. To estimate the progression free survival (PFS) in patients with leiomyosarcoma treated with peposertib and low-dose liposomal doxorubicin. (Dose Expansion) IV. To assess the pharmacokinetics of peposertib and liposomal doxorubicin used in combination with each other. (Dose Expansion) V. To assess whether DNA damage is exaggerated by the low-dose liposomal doxorubicin in combination with peposertib in patients with homologous recombination (HR)-deficiency. (Dose Expansion) CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES: I. To test the hypothesis that soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) like leiomyosarcomas (LMS) will be more susceptible to DNA-protein kinase inhibitor (PKi) in combination with low-dose liposomal doxorubicin. II. To test the hypothesis that gammaH2AX and pNBS1 can be used as pharmacodynamic biomarkers of response to DNA-PKi in combination with low-dose liposomal doxorubicin. III. To test the hypothesis that disease activity correlates with circulating tumor DNA levels in the plasma. OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of peposertib and liposomal doxorubicin followed by a dose-expansion study. Patients receive peposertib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-28 of each cycle and liposomal doxorubicin intravenously (IV) on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Patients undergo blood sample collection and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial. Patients also undergo tissue biopsy and echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) during screening and on the trial. Patients are followed for 30 days after removal from study or until death, whichever occurs first.
Arms & interventions
- ProcedureBiopsy Procedure
Undergo tissue biopsy
- ProcedureBiospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
- ProcedureComputed Tomography
Undergo CT scan
- ProcedureEchocardiography Test
Undergo ECHO
- ProcedureMagnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
- ProcedureMultigated Acquisition Scan
Undergo MUGA
- DrugPegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride
Given IV
- DrugPeposertib
Given PO
Outcome measures
Primary
Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) rate
The number and type of DLT seen at each dose level will be provided. The adverse events (AEs) will also be summarized by AE type and the maximum grade of the AE experienced by the patient for each dose level. DLT will be used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of study drugs.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Secondary
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of study treatment
Objective response rate
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Progression free survival
Time frame: From study enrollment until disease progression (determined by RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Deoxyribonucleic acid damage repair activity
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (16)
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross
New Lenox, Illinois, 60451
University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park
Orland Park, Illinois, 60462
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Clinic
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Siteman Cancer Center-South County
St Louis, Missouri, 63129
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Virginia Cancer Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908