Cancerify Logo
Log inSign up
Back to clinical trials
RecruitingInterventional

Assessment of a Radiomics-based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Tool for Cancer Risk Stratification of Pulmonary Nodules

NCT ID: NCT05968898Sponsor: Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineLast updated: 2026-06-02

Summary

This is a pragmatic clinical trial that will study the effect of a radiomics-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool on clinicians' management of pulmonary nodules (PNs) compared to usual care. Adults aged 35-89 years with 8-30mm PNs evaluated at Penn Medicine PN clinics will undergo 1:1 randomization to one of two groups, defined by the PN malignancy risk stratification strategy used by evaluating clinicians: 1) usual care or 2) usual care + use of a radiomics-based CAD tool.

Detailed description

Accurate malignancy risk stratification of pulmonary nodules (PNs) is critical to ensuring that cancer is diagnosed in a timely manner and patients do not undergo unnecessary diagnostic procedures. Preliminary data suggests that a radiomics-based lung cancer prediction (LCP) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool is effective in risk stratifying PNs and may improve clinicians' PN management decisions. This is a pragmatic clinical trial evaluating the effect of this CAD tool on clinicians' management of PNs compared to usual care. Individuals eligible for this study will include adults aged 35-89 years who are scheduled to be evaluated at a Penn Medicine PN clinic for a newly discovered PN 8-30mm in maximal diameter on CT imaging. Exclusion criteria include lack of CT imaging data at the time of index clinic visit, thoracic lymphadenopathy by CT size criteria, presence of pulmonary masses (\>3cm in maximal diameter), PNs with popcorn calcification (consistent with benign etiology), pure ground-glass subsolid PNs, a history of lung cancer, and history of any active cancer within 5 years. Enrolled participants will undergo 1:1 stratified randomization to one of two groups, defined by the PN malignancy risk stratification strategy used by evaluating clinicians: 1) usual care (clinician assessment) or 2) clinician assessment + CAD-based risk stratification using the LCP-CAD tool. The control arm will be usual care, defined as routine clinician assessment of PN malignancy risk. In the experimental arm, clinicians will be provided a report with the CAD tool estimate of malignancy risk for the PN being evaluated.

Arms & interventions

  • DeviceOptellum Virtual Nodule Clinic

    The Optellum Virtual Nodule Clinic is an FDA-approved (Class II) device for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules. It uses a convolutional neural network to evaluate CT imaging data to provide an estimate of malignancy risk for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Outcome measures

Primary

  • Appropriate management of pulmonary nodule

    The composite proportion of benign pulmonary nodules managed with imaging surveillance and malignant pulmonary nodules managed with biopsy or empiric treatment. Final pulmonary nodule diagnosis will be categorized as malignant or benign based on pathologic evaluation. If pathology is unavailable or inconclusive (i.e., the biopsy was non-diagnostic), pulmonary nodule resolution, shrinkage, or diameter stability at 12 months will be defined as a benign diagnosis.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

  • Timeliness of care

    Time frame: 12 months

  • Adverse events

    Time frame: 12 months

  • Diagnostic yield

    Time frame: 12 months

  • Healthcare costs

    Time frame: 12 months

Eligibility criteria

Sex: AllAge: 35 Years to 89 YearsHealthy volunteers: No
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female, aged 35-89 years 2. Scheduled to be evaluated at a UPHS PN clinic 3. Newly discovered solid or part-solid indeterminate PN 8-30mm in maximal diameter on CT imaging within 60 days of index clinic visit 4. Chest CT imaging meeting the technical requirements for compatibility with Optellum Virtual Nodule Clinic software Exclusion Criteria: 1. Chest CT imaging with discrete mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy by CT size criteria (\>10mm in maximal short-axis diameter on axial CT images) 2. PNs with popcorn calcification (consistent with benign etiology) 3. Pure ground-glass subsolid PNs (may be associated with lower risk of clinically significant malignancy) 4. PN previously seen on CT imaging \>60 days prior to most recent CT 5. More than one indeterminate PN 8-30mm in maximal diameter 6. History of lung cancer 7. History of active cancer within the previous 5 years 8. Presence of a thoracic implant that impedes PN visualization

Study locations (3)

Penn Medicine University City

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Recruiting
Roger Kim, MD, MSCE · Contact

Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Recruiting
Roger Kim, MD, MSCE · Contact

Penn Medicine Washington Square

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Recruiting
Roger Kim, MD, MSCE · Contact

References

  • Kim RY, Oke JL, Pickup LC, Munden RF, Dotson TL, Bellinger CR, Cohen A, Simoff MJ, Massion PP, Filippini C, Gleeson FV, Vachani A. Artificial Intelligence Tool for Assessment of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules Detected with CT. Radiology. 2022 Sep;304(3):683-691. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212182. Epub 2022 May 24.(PubMed)
  • Kim RY, Oke JL, Dotson TL, Bellinger CR, Vachani A. Effect of an artificial intelligence tool on management decisions for indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Respirology. 2023 Jun;28(6):582-584. doi: 10.1111/resp.14502. Epub 2023 Apr 5. No abstract available.(PubMed)
  • Massion PP, Antic S, Ather S, Arteta C, Brabec J, Chen H, Declerck J, Dufek D, Hickes W, Kadir T, Kunst J, Landman BA, Munden RF, Novotny P, Peschl H, Pickup LC, Santos C, Smith GT, Talwar A, Gleeson F. Assessing the Accuracy of a Deep Learning Method to Risk Stratify Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 15;202(2):241-249. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0505OC.(PubMed)
  • Baldwin DR, Gustafson J, Pickup L, Arteta C, Novotny P, Declerck J, Kadir T, Figueiras C, Sterba A, Exell A, Potesil V, Holland P, Spence H, Clubley A, O'Dowd E, Clark M, Ashford-Turner V, Callister ME, Gleeson FV. External validation of a convolutional neural network artificial intelligence tool to predict malignancy in pulmonary nodules. Thorax. 2020 Apr;75(4):306-312. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214104. Epub 2020 Mar 5.(PubMed)
  • Paez R, Kammer MN, Balar A, Lakhani DA, Knight M, Rowe D, Xiao D, Heideman BE, Antic SL, Chen H, Chen SC, Peikert T, Sandler KL, Landman BA, Deppen SA, Grogan EL, Maldonado F. Longitudinal lung cancer prediction convolutional neural network model improves the classification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33098-y.(PubMed)
  • Paez R, Kammer MN, Tanner NT, Shojaee S, Heideman BE, Peikert T, Balbach ML, Iams WT, Ning B, Lenburg ME, Mallow C, Yarmus L, Fong KM, Deppen S, Grogan EL, Maldonado F. Update on Biomarkers for the Stratification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules. Chest. 2023 Oct;164(4):1028-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 May 25.(PubMed)
  • Kim RY. Radiomics and artificial intelligence for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules: Ready for primetime? Cancer Biomark. 2025 Jan;42(1):CBM230360. doi: 10.3233/CBM-230360. Epub 2024 Feb 6.(PubMed)
Assessment of a Radiomics-based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Tool for Pulmonary nodulES | Cancerify