Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GIVinostat Versus Hydroxyurea IN JAK2V617F-positive High-risk Polycythemia Vera Patients: the GIV-IN PV TRIAL
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of givinostat to hydroxyurea in Jak2V617F-positive high risk polycythemia vera patients.
Detailed description
PV is a cMPN mainly driven by JAK2V617F mutation. The disease has an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, a predisposition to evolve into myelofibrosis (MF) and transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. Patients ≥ 60 years of age and/or with a previous thrombotic event (TE) are considered at High Risk (HR) for thrombosis. The association of absolute values of circulating neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte and the high value of JAK2V617F allele burden are additional risk factors for the occurrence of thrombosis and for progression to MF, respectively. Overall, most patients treated with HU are not adequately under control for both symptoms and long-term risks. In recent years, data have shown that histone deacetylase (HDACs) inhibitors induce growth arrest, differentiation, and/or apoptosis in neoplastic cells. Givinostat has demonstrated preliminary signs of clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with JAK2V617F-positive cMPNs in three phase 2 studies. The core treatment phase (pivotal phase 3 study) is designed to demonstrate the superiority of givinostat versus HU on efficacy, in JAK2V617F-positive, HR PV patients. The extended treatment phase will allow eligible patients to receive givinostat in the long-term, with the objective of collecting long-term safety and efficacy data.
Arms & interventions
- DrugGivinostat
Oral. The dosage must be modified, according to the manifestation of toxicities or lack of efficacy, with the aim to achieve an optimized dose.
- DrugHydroxyurea
Oral. The dosage must be modified, according to the manifestation of toxicities or lack of efficacy, with the aim to achieve an optimized dose.
Outcome measures
Primary
Proportion of patients achieving a response at Week 48.
Response assessment based on: * Hematocrit \< 45% without phlebotomy in the prior 3 months, and * White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 × 109/L, and * Platelet count ≤ 400 × 109/L, and * Normal spleen size as measured by imaging (normal spleen size is defined as: a longitudinal diameter ≤ 12 cm for female and ≤ 13 cm for male) and * During Part 2 (Week 25 to 48), absence of progressive disease, major hemorrhagic events and major thrombotic events.
Time frame: week 25 - week 48
Secondary
Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological response (CHR) at Week 48.
Time frame: week 48
Time from randomization to the first observed CHR
Time frame: Randomization - week 48
Proportion of patients with a normal spleen size at Week 48.
Time frame: week 48
Safety and tolerability up to Week 48.
Time frame: Randomization - week 48
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (14)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0001
Emad Ibrahim, MD, Inc
Redlands, California, 92373
US Oncology Inc
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
American Oncology Partners of Maryland, PA
Bethesda, Maryland, 20852
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Oncology Associates of Oregon, P.C.
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Texas Oncology (Webster) - USOR
Houston, Texas, 77089
Texas Oncology-Denison Cancer Center
Sherman, Texas, 75090
University of Utah - Huntsman Cancer Institute - PPDS
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
Roanoke, Virginia, 43210
VA Puget Sound Health Care System - NAVREF - PPDS
Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532