A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Face of Topical Tretinoin Prophylaxis for Anti-EGFR Induced Skin Toxicity in Patients With Solid Tumors
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using topical tretinoin will help patients with solid tumors who are experiencing an acneiform rash as a side effect of their treatment. Researchers will compare the use of tretinoin on one side of the face to the use of a placebo on the other side of the face to see if there is an impact.
Detailed description
The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents cetuximab and panitumumab have been shown in numerous trials to be active in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Current American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines strongly recommend offering an antiEGFR therapy in combination with chemotherapy to patients with treatment-naïve, left-sided, RAS wild-type mCRC. In addition to colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR agents are also approved for use in the management of head and neck, cutaneous squamous cell, and penile cancers. Novel prophylactic approaches are needed so that more patients can benefit from the survival advantage provided by these drugs without a sacrificing quality of life. Tretinoin is a vitamin A derivative (all-trans retinoic acid) that has been used by dermatology for more than five decades and is currently approved for the management of moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Initially, tretinoin was recognized as a potential treatment for acne vulgaris based on its comedolytic properties. However, over the past decade tretinoin has been increasingly recognized for its immunomodulatory properties raising the potential for use in dermatologic disorders other than acne vulgaris. Although the pathogenesis of anti-EGFR associated skin toxicity is still not entirely understood, the clinical presentation shares many similarities with acne vulgaris, and inflammation is felt to play a major role. For this reason, there is interest in the use of tretinoin in the management of anti-EGFR associated rash. Topical tretinoin is associated with minimal transdermal absorption thus making it a viable option for investigation into its use as a prophylactic agent for anti-EGFR associated rash. This split-face study will utilize a topical moisturizer as a placebo applied to the opposite half of the face as the topical tretinoin. Eucerin, a topical emollient will be used as the placebo in this study. Eucerin is not associated with any significant adverse reactions. This is a randomized, double-blind, split-face, phase II study of topical tretinoin prophylaxis for anti-EGFR treatment-induced skin toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Patients will apply topical tretinoin to one half of the face and topical moisturizer (placebo) to the other half of the face daily, starting the day that anti-EGFR treatment is initiated. The sides of the face tretinoin and moisturizer are applied to will be randomized. Standardized photographs of the face will be obtained at screening and every two weeks from Week 1 Day 1 until after six weeks of treatment. Photographs will be graded by a dermatologist who will be blinded to treatment sidedness. Facial rash severity will be graded using a modified Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) score.
Arms & interventions
- DrugTopical Tretinoin
Topical tretinoin will be applied to one half of the face, either left or right side. The side the topical tretinoin will be applied to will be randomized.
- OtherPlacebo
A placebo (topical moisturizer) will be applied to the other half of the face, either left or right side. The side the topical tretinoin will be applied to will be randomized.
Outcome measures
Primary
The maximum difference in modified Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) score between the treated and untreated sides of the face at any assessment.
Effect of topical tretinoin on anti-EGFR induced acneiform rash. Rash will be scored from 0-4 with 0 being clear skin and 4 being a severe rash.
Time frame: up to 6 weeks from the initiation of study therapy
Secondary
Frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by type, severity (as defined by the NIH CTCAE version 5.0 and the modified IGA), seriousness, duration, and relationship to study treatment.
Time frame: up to 6 weeks from the initiation of study therapy
Proportion of acneiform rash per CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: up to 6 weeks from the initiation of study therapy
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
References
- Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Zubel A, Celik I, Rougier P, Ciardiello F. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091. Epub 2011 Apr 18.(PubMed)
- Berlin J, Posey J, Tchekmedyian S, Hu E, Chan D, Malik I, Yang L, Amado RG, Hecht JR. Panitumumab with irinotecan/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007 Mar;6(6):427-32. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2007.n.011.(PubMed)
- Kohne CH, Hofheinz R, Mineur L, Letocha H, Greil R, Thaler J, Fernebro E, Gamelin E, Decosta L, Karthaus M. First-line panitumumab plus irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan;138(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1061-6. Epub 2011 Sep 30.(PubMed)
- Watanabe J, Muro K, Shitara K, Yamazaki K, Shiozawa M, Ohori H, Takashima A, Yokota M, Makiyama A, Akazawa N, Ojima H, Yuasa Y, Miwa K, Yasui H, Oki E, Sato T, Naitoh T, Komatsu Y, Kato T, Hihara M, Soeda J, Misumi T, Yamamoto K, Akagi K, Ochiai A, Uetake H, Tsuchihara K, Yoshino T. Panitumumab vs Bevacizumab Added to Standard First-line Chemotherapy and Overall Survival Among Patients With RAS Wild-type, Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1271-1282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4428.(PubMed)
- Nevala-Plagemann C, Iyengar S, Trunk AD, Pappas L, Haaland B, Garrido-Laguna I. Treatment Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Left-Sided RAS/RAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Feb 4;20(3):268-275. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7079.(PubMed)
- Ciliberto D, Staropoli N, Caglioti F, Chiellino S, Ierardi A, Ingargiola R, Botta C, Arbitrio M, Correale P, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P. The best strategy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients in first-line treatment: A classic and Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 May;125:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 9.(PubMed)
- Morris VK, Kennedy EB, Baxter NN, Benson AB 3rd, Cercek A, Cho M, Ciombor KK, Cremolini C, Davis A, Deming DA, Fakih MG, Gholami S, Hong TS, Jaiyesimi I, Klute K, Lieu C, Sanoff H, Strickler JH, White S, Willis JA, Eng C. Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):678-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01690. Epub 2022 Oct 17.(PubMed)
- Lacouture ME, Anadkat M, Jatoi A, Garawin T, Bohac C, Mitchell E. Dermatologic Toxicity Occurring During Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Jun;17(2):85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.(PubMed)
- Lacouture ME, Mitchell EP, Piperdi B, Pillai MV, Shearer H, Iannotti N, Xu F, Yassine M. Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-Emptive Skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1351-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7828. Epub 2010 Feb 8.(PubMed)
- Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, Alikhan A, Baldwin HE, Berson DS, Bowe WP, Graber EM, Harper JC, Kang S, Keri JE, Leyden JJ, Reynolds RV, Silverberg NB, Stein Gold LF, Tollefson MM, Weiss JS, Dolan NC, Sagan AA, Stern M, Boyer KM, Bhushan R. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 May;74(5):945-73.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037. Epub 2016 Feb 17.(PubMed)
- Baldwin HE, Nighland M, Kendall C, Mays DA, Grossman R, Newburger J. 40 years of topical tretinoin use in review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Jun 1;12(6):638-42.(PubMed)
- Schmidt N, Gans EH. Tretinoin: A Review of Its Anti-inflammatory Properties in the Treatment of Acne. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Nov;4(11):22-9.(PubMed)
- Holcmann M, Sibilia M. Mechanisms underlying skin disorders induced by EGFR inhibitors. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015 Jun 1;2(4):e1004969. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1004969. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.(PubMed)
- Vezzoli P, Marzano AV, Onida F, Alessi E, Galassi B, Tomirotti M, Berti E. Cetuximab-induced acneiform eruption and the response to isotretinoin. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(1):84-6. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0330. No abstract available.(PubMed)
- Gutzmer R, Werfel T, Mao R, Kapp A, Elsner J. Successful treatment with oral isotretinoin of acneiform skin lesions associated with cetuximab therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Oct;153(4):849-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06835.x. No abstract available.(PubMed)