Pilot Testing of Metacognitive Strategy Training to Address Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer
Summary
The goal of this proposed project is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effect of metacognitive strategy training to improve activity performance, cognition, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). The other goal of this proposed project is to examine the effects of CO-OP on resting (rsFC)- and task-state functional connectivity as compared to an inactive control group.
Detailed description
Breast cancer survivors often self-report cognitive deficits, primarily in executive functioning (planning, problem solving, multitasking), memory, and processing speed after cancer treatment, i.e., cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). The prevalence of CRCI following breast cancer is as high as 78% and can persist chronically after treatment has ended. In other health conditions associated with cognitive impairment, such as traumatic brain injury, the only evidence-based recommended practice standard for deficits in executive function is metacognitive strategy training (MCST). In this approach, participants are taught a general cognitive strategy that can be applied in known and novel contexts to devise task specific strategies to successfully engage in an activity. While the cognitive deficits identified in and described by breast cancer survivors seem quite amenable to MCST, there is no study in the published literature which measures the efficacy of MCST on CRCI. The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach is a MCST intervention in which subjects are taught a general cognitive strategy that can be applied in known and novel contexts to devise task specific strategies to engage in an activity. Preliminary data suggest that CO-OP may have a positive impact on subjective and objective cognitive performance in breast cancer survivors with CRCI. Further, this study will evaluate the neurophysiological underpinnings associated with treatment changes through the use of neuroimaging methods.
Arms & interventions
- BehavioralMetacognitive Strategy Training (MCST)
The MCST group will follow procedures for the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, the therapist introduces the approach to the subject and teach a global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition. The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
- BehavioralInactive Control Group
Weekly contact will be made via telephone call to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce cognitive symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes.
Outcome measures
Primary
Feasibility measures
Recruitment rate, retention rate
Time frame: After study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Performance
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Satisfaction
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Secondary
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
The Activity Card Sort (ACS)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Participation Strategies Self Efficacy Scale (PS-SES)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65211
References
- Hutchinson AD, Hosking JR, Kichenadasse G, Mattiske JK, Wilson C. Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Nov;38(7):926-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 2.(PubMed)
- O'Farrell E, MacKenzie J, Collins B. Clearing the air: a review of our current understanding of "chemo fog". Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0307-7.(PubMed)
- Schagen SB, Wefel JS. Chemotherapy-related changes in cognitive functioning. EJC Suppl. 2013 Sep;11(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.007. No abstract available.(PubMed)
- Myers JS. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Aug;13(4):413-21. doi: 10.1188/09.CJON.413-421.(PubMed)
- Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):431-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014.(PubMed)
- Wefel JS, Schagen SB. Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):267-75. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0264-9.(PubMed)
- Janelsins MC, Kesler SR, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;26(1):102-13. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.864260.(PubMed)
- Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, Herzog J, Kneipp S, Laatsch L, Morse PA. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12):1596-615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.(PubMed)
- Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.(PubMed)
- Haskins E. Cognitive Rehabilitation Manual: Translating Evidence-Based Recommendations into Practice. vol 1. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2012.
- Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, Coalson RS, Nicklaus J, Ma CX, Schlaggar BL, Piccirillo J. The Feasibility of Using Metacognitive Strategy Training to Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Connectivity in Women with Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Oncology. 2016;91(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000447744. Epub 2016 Jul 23.(PubMed)