Digital Health Intervention to Improve Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Young Childhood Cancer Survivors in Underserved Communities
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and improve an online program for caregivers of young childhood cancer survivors called the Preparing for Life and Academics for Young Survivors program (PLAY). The PLAY program was created with a group of caregivers of young children with cancer and healthcare providers. Ultimately, investigators hope to see if the program can improve positive parenting behaviors, reduce caregiver stress, and help get young children ready for school. In the preliminary phase of this clinical trial, investigators are aiming to answer these questions: 1. Are caregivers of childhood cancer survivors willing to participate in the PLAY program and complete assessments before and after the program? 2. Do caregivers of childhood cancer survivors rate the PLAY program as easy to use? 3. Are caregivers of childhood cancer survivors satisfied with the PLAY program? 4. How can the PLAY program be improved in the future? 5. Does PLAY help improve how caregivers interact and read with their children or how they manage their own stress? When the child is transitioning to maintenance phase therapies or is no longer actively in cancer treatment, caregivers will be invited to participate. If they agree to participate, they will complete surveys when they begin the study as well as a videotaped interaction task reading and playing with their child. Children will complete brief developmental testing at the beginning of the program. Caregivers will then complete the PLAY Program, which will involve completing 7 weekly or bi-weekly online modules and meeting with a trained coach by videoconference for up to 10 one-hour sessions over three months. Sessions will focus on helping their child get ready for school and helping their family adjust and cope with stress. Caregivers will repeat the surveys and videotaped interaction task again three months later, after the PLAY program is completed. They will also be invited to participate in an interview to learn about their experience in the program. This study will happen over two phases. Participants in Phase I of this study will complete all parts of the study as described above. Participants in Phase II (beginning in winter 2025) will complete all parts of the study as described above and a six month follow up that will involve repeating the similar questionnaires and an additional videotaped interaction with their child. Teachers of children will also take part in Phase II with questionnaires at baseline and 3-months later, after participants have completed the PLAY program.
Detailed description
This study will occur in two phases. Phase I will involve rapid cycle testing of the intervention and Phase II will be a single-arm trial of the PLAY program. For phase I, the aim of this study is to refine PLAY to optimize feasibility and acceptability (ORBIT Phase Ib) through rapid-cycle testing with families of YCCS (n=5 per group, up to 15 total) in partnership with advisory boards comprised of 10 families of YCCS, including rural and Appalachian YCCS, and 10 healthcare providers ("co-designers"). Rapid cycle testing to iteratively refine PLAY will determine its optimal timing, dose, and duration until three caregivers sequentially endorse above-average usability (System Usability Scale score \>68), feasibility, and acceptability ratings (\>80%), or up to n=15 families have completed the PLAY program. Following rapid cycle testing, phase II will involve a single-arm trial of PLAY program with up to 20 new families of YCCS to evaluate the refined program's feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept. Caregivers will be recruited and will participate using analogous procedures and measures, as described in Phase I, with the addition of 6-month post-baseline assessments.
Arms & interventions
- OtherPLAY Program
The PLAY Program is a web-based program created for caregivers of childhood cancer survivors. The program consists of seven modules with the following topics: 1) Introduction to the program 2) Self-Care 3) Relationships 4) Getting Ready for School 5) Talking, Reading, and Counting together 6) Social and Emotional Development 7) Review Module. The program is meant to be completed over approximately three months, and caregivers in the program will meet with a coach on a weekly or bi-weekly basis to discuss what they learned in the modules and how to practice it in their daily lives.
Outcome measures
Primary
System Usability Scale
This is a 10-item measure that will quantitatively assess usability of our web-based program. The SUS measures how accessible the website is and whether participants can understand the content of the website on a scale of 0-100. We will continue to recruit until our website has achieved an average score of \>68% (above average).
Time frame: 3 months post-enrollment
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Participants will use this four-item measure to rate the appropriateness of the PLAY program. Each item is rated from 1-5 and the final score for the measure is the average number for all answers. A higher score means a participant rated the PLAY program as more appropriate, an overall score of 4 or higher (80%) means a participant found the program to be appropriate.
Time frame: 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
This is a four-item measure that will have participants rate the acceptability of the PLAY program. Each item is rated from 1-5 and the final score for the measure is the average number for all answers. A higher score means a participant rated the PLAY program as more acceptable, an overall score of 4 or higher (80%) means a participant found the program to be acceptable.
Time frame: 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Adapted Website Evaluation Questionnaire (WEQ)
This measure will assess accessibility and satisfaction with the PLAY Program. Four overall items will be rated from 1-10 by participants. The overall score will be the average response across items. A higher score indicates higher satisfaction with the program. Overall scores of 8 or higher (\> 80%) are an indication of satisfaction with the PLAY program.
Time frame: 3 months post-enrollment
Feasibility of the PLAY program
Enrollment rate (#enrolled/#approached; milestone greater than or equal to 50%), completion rate (# completing core PLAY sessions/#enrolled; milestone greater than or equal to 75%), retention rate (#completers of 3 and 6 month assessments/ # enrolled at baseline; milestone greater than or equal to 70%); Caregivers who rate the intervention greater than or equal to 80% on the Feasibility Intervention Measure (FIM; milestone \>80%), which is a four-item measure. Each item is rated from 1-5 and the final score for the measure is the average number for all answers. A higher score means a participant rated the PLAY program as more feasible, an overall score of 4 or higher (80%) means a participant found the program to be feasible.
Time frame: 3 month post-enrollment (Phase I); 3 and 6 month post-enrollment (Phase II)
Secondary
Play and Alternative Learning Strategies parent-child interaction coding
Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 month follow up (Phase II)
Parenting Stress Index-Short Form
Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment (Phase II)
Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment (Phase II)
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
References
- Moscato EL, Darow E, Quach J, M Winning A, Schmidt M, Wade SL, Gerhardt CA, Sezgin E. Usability Testing of an Internet-Based Responsive Parenting Program for Caregivers of Young Survivors of Childhood Cancer Living in Rural and Appalachian Communities: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Aug 5;8:e70055. doi: 10.2196/70055.(PubMed)
- Yao N, Alcala HE, Anderson R, Balkrishnan R. Cancer Disparities in Rural Appalachia: Incidence, Early Detection, and Survivorship. J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):375-381. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12213. Epub 2016 Sep 7.(PubMed)
- Wochos GC, Semerjian CH, Walsh KS. Differences in parent and teacher rating of everyday executive function in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(8):1243-57. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.971875. Epub 2014 Oct 24.(PubMed)
- Winter AL, Conklin HM, Tyc VL, Stancel H, Hinds PS, Hudson MM, Kahalley LS. Executive function late effects in survivors of pediatric brain tumors and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(8):818-30. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.943695. Epub 2014 Aug 15.(PubMed)
- Willard VW, Qaddoumi I, Zhang H, Huang L, Russell KM, Brennan R, Wilson MW, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Phipps S. A longitudinal investigation of parenting stress in caregivers of children with retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Apr;64(4):10.1002/pbc.26279. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26279. Epub 2016 Nov 3.(PubMed)
- Willard VW, Gordon ML, Means B, Brennan RC, Conklin HM, Merchant TE, Vinitsky A, Harman JL. Social-Emotional Functioning in Preschool-Aged Children With Cancer: Comparisons Between Children With Brain and Non-CNS Solid Tumors. J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;46(7):790-800. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab018.(PubMed)
- Willard VW, Cox LE, Russell KM, Kenney A, Jurbergs N, Molnar AE Jr, Harman JL. Cognitive and Psychosocial Functioning of Preschool-Aged Children with Cancer. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Oct;38(8):638-645. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000512.(PubMed)
- Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.(PubMed)
- Ward R, Reynolds JE, Pieterse B, Elliott C, Boyd R, Miller L. Utilisation of coaching practices in early interventions in children at risk of developmental disability/delay: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Oct;42(20):2846-2867. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1581846. Epub 2019 Apr 25.(PubMed)
- Wade SL, Cassedy AE, Shultz EL, Zang H, Zhang N, Kirkwood MW, Stancin T, Yeates KO, Taylor HG. Randomized Clinical Trial of Online Parent Training for Behavior Problems After Early Brain Injury. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;56(11):930-939.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.09.413. Epub 2017 Sep 14.(PubMed)
- Vance YH, Eiser C. The school experience of the child with cancer. Child Care Health Dev. 2002 Jan;28(1):5-19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00227.x.(PubMed)
- Van Schoors M, Caes L, Knoble NB, Goubert L, Verhofstadt LL, Alderfer MA; Guest Editors: Cynthia A. Gerhardt, Cynthia A. Berg, Deborah J. Wiebe and Grayson N. Holmbeck. Systematic Review: Associations Between Family Functioning and Child Adjustment After Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Jan 1;42(1):6-18. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw070.(PubMed)
- Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 1;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.(PubMed)
- Schorr E, Wade SL, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Yeates KO. Parenting styles as a predictor of long-term psychosocial outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in early childhood. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Aug;42(17):2437-2443. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1602676. Epub 2019 Apr 21.(PubMed)
- Rodriguez EM, Dunn MJ, Zuckerman T, Vannatta K, Gerhardt CA, Compas BE. Cancer-related sources of stress for children with cancer and their parents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 Mar;37(2):185-97. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr054. Epub 2011 Aug 13.(PubMed)