Use of a Comprehensive, Mobile Application to Assist Cancer Patients With Diet, Nutrition and Activity
Summary
The overarching purpose of this study is to assess whether patients will use the app throughout treatment on a regular basis, as the ultimate goal is to provide an educational platform that can impact patient behaviors and understanding towards health.
Detailed description
In the last decade, smartphones have become an essential part of society with the mobile application market offering services across all aspects of life, including healthcare. Mobile health care apps have developed a field of their own termed "mobile health" or m-health with apps available to help patients do everything from managing symptoms and tracking medications to improving treatment compliance. Apps have been developed specifically tailored for oncology patients. One randomized controlled trial provided oncology patients receiving palliative care with a mobile application that used artificial intelligence (AI) to regularly monitor and manage pain between clinic visits. Results showed that the app was an effective tool to manage pain. Patients who used the app reported an overall decrease in pain severity and experienced fewer inpatient hospitalizations due to cancer-related pain compared with patients who did not use the app. M-health applications are well utilized in low-income populations and among both English and Spanish speakers. Despite the exciting potential m-Health offers for providers and patients, it also presents challenges. One systematic review identified barriers to adoption of m-health apps by health care professionals including difficult user experience (i.e., users found the app difficult to use and navigate), design and technical issues, security concerns, and perceived usefulness. Therefore, when designing an m-Health app, care must be taken to ensure that it is functional, easy to use, and provides patients and providers with valuable information in order to ensure that users will engage with the app. M-health apps should also be designed to supplement information exchanged during clinical encounters, fill in gaps in clinical workflow, and be appropriate for the target patient population. Low socioeconomic status is associated with increased disease prevalence and low quality of life after diagnosis. Bronx county, New York, which is coterminous with the New York City borough of The Bronx, is an urban, medically underserved and economically depressed area, which is associated with an elevated relative rate of chronic diseases including obesity, diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Over 70% of patients served by the Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center (MECC) live beneath the poverty line suggesting that the patient population served by MECC is at risk for poor nutrition status. With the goal of improving availability of evidence-based nutritional information to MECC patients, both in the active-treatment and survivorship settings, the study team has developed "RestoreMe," an easy-to-use mobile device application that provides nutrition education, personalized recommendations, recipes, exercises and more. RestoreMe also allows cancer patients and providers an easy-to-use resource with which to communicate directly with one another, which may increase patient engagement and compliance with their overall care. In this study, the study team will investigate the regularity of app use by patients and which functions of the app are used effectively and most often. Usage trends specific to particular patient subgroups will also be evaluated. The results of this feasibility study will inform a future prospective interventional study using the RestoreMe app.
Arms & interventions
- OtherRestoreMe
Comprehensive mobile device application
Outcome measures
Primary
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with the RestoreMe app will be measured using the Technology Acceptability Survey (TAS). The TAS consists of 10 questions including 7 quantitative items which will be used to assess Patient Satisfaction for the purposes of the study. Each of the 7 quantitative items on the survey represent a unique satisfaction parameter and are scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1-5. Lower scores for an item correlate with increased satisfaction with the specific parameter and higher scores for an item correlate with decreased satisfaction for the specific parameter, yielding an overall possible scoring range of 7-35. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Time frame: Upon completion of treatment regimen or up to 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Secondary
Frequency of Dailly Engagement - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Frequency of Weekly Engagement - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Frequency of Monthly Engagement - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Frequency of Daily Engagement - Providers
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Frequency of Weekly Engagement - Providers
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Frequency of Monthly Engagement - Providers
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Average Daily Interaction Time - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Average Weekly Interaction Time - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Average Monthly Interaction Time - Patients
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Drop-out over time.
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months (+/1 month) after study entry
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
References
- Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv052. Epub 2015 Jun 15.(PubMed)
- Kamdar, Mihir M., et al.
- Liu, Patrick, et al.
- Mielck A, Vogelmann M, Leidl R. Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 25;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-58.(PubMed)
- NYS DOH. 2013-2014 NYS Expanded Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, data as of 2015. Available: https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/chac/general/g75.htm. Accessed 23 September 2016.
- Pierce JP, Faerber S, Wright FA, Rock CL, Newman V, Flatt SW, Kealey S, Jones VE, Caan BJ, Gold EB, Haan M, Hollenbach KA, Jones L, Marshall JR, Ritenbaugh C, Stefanick ML, Thomson C, Wasserman L, Natarajan L, Thomas RG, Gilpin EA; Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study group. A randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study. Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):728-56. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00241-6.(PubMed)
- Chan DSM, Vieira AR, Aune D, Bandera EV, Greenwood DC, McTiernan A, Navarro Rosenblatt D, Thune I, Vieira R, Norat T. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1901-1914. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu042. Epub 2014 Apr 27.(PubMed)
- Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Oct;123(3):627-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0990-0. Epub 2010 Jun 23.(PubMed)
- Ewertz M, Jensen MB, Gunnarsdottir KA, Hojris I, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen D, Stenbygaard LE, Tange UB, Cold S. Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):25-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7614. Epub 2010 Nov 29.(PubMed)
- Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A. Weight loss in breast cancer patient management. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 15;20(4):1128-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1128.(PubMed)
- Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 24;348(17):1625-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021423.(PubMed)
- Glade MJ. Food, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research/World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997. Nutrition. 1999 Jun;15(6):523-6. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00021-0. No abstract available.(PubMed)
- Knoops KT, de Groot LC, Kromhout D, Perrin AE, Moreiras-Varela O, Menotti A, van Staveren WA. Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA. 2004 Sep 22;292(12):1433-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.12.1433.(PubMed)
- Morote J, Celma A, Planas J, Placer J, de Torres I, Olivan M, Carles J, Reventos J, Doll A. Role of serum cholesterol and statin use in the risk of prostate cancer detection and tumor aggressiveness. Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Aug 6;15(8):13615-23. doi: 10.3390/ijms150813615.(PubMed)
- Kok DE, van Roermund JG, Aben KK, den Heijer M, Swinkels DW, Kampman E, Kiemeney LA. Blood lipid levels and prostate cancer risk; a cohort study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011 Dec;14(4):340-5. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.30. Epub 2011 Jul 5.(PubMed)