Cancerify Logo
Log inSign up
Back to clinical trials
RecruitingInterventional

Improving Outcomes for Women Experiencing Premature or Early Menopause After Cancer: Development and Pilot Testing of a Novel Intervention

NCT ID: NCT06982677Sponsor: Duke UniversityLast updated: 2026-05-14

Summary

The goal of this study is to create and test a new program led by nurse navigators to help women who experience early menopause after cancer. The program includes personalized menopause education, decision support, and skills to manage menopause symptoms. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the program easy to join, engaging, and well-received by participants? 2. Does the program group show greater improvements in knowledge, decision-making, confidence, and menopause symptom management compared to the control group? Participants will complete sessions of either the program being tested or an educational control program with a nurse navigator via video. Participants will also complete questionnaires when they start the study and again about 10 weeks later.

Detailed description

The study aims to develop and pilot test a novel nurse navigator-delivered intervention for women experiencing premature and early menopause after cancer. The proposed intervention integrates 1) personalized, risk-based menopause health education and decision support, 2) skills derived from patient activation theory to increase self-efficacy and engagement in menopause self-management, and 3) cognitive-behavioral theory-based skills (e.g., stress management, relaxation techniques, challenging unhelpful thoughts, and activity pacing) for menopause symptom management. Phase I: Develop and refine an intervention for women experiencing premature or early menopause after cancer. The intervention content will be developed and refined with input and review by women cancer survivors experiencing premature or early menopause (N=24) and medical providers (N=24) who care for this population. The intervention will be further refined with input and review by our study advisory council. Next, user testing (N=9) will be conducted to guide further refinement of content, format and procedures and to obtain feedback for finalizing the intervention protocol that will then be tested in a small pilot randomized controlled trial. Phase II: Pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the developed intervention. A new sample of female cancer survivors experiencing premature or early menopause will be randomized to receive the intervention or educational materials for cancer survivors developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to examine the feasibility of study recruitment, participant retention and acceptability.

Arms & interventions

  • BehavioralNurse Navigator Intervention

    The intervention will integrate education, decision support, patient activation strategies, and cognitive-behavioral menopause symptom management skills. Participants will receive video and audio-recorded materials and a written manual.

  • OtherEducation Control

    The control arm will receive the National Cancer Institute booklet, "Facing Forward: Life After Cancer Treatment," which provides basic strategies for navigating cancer survivorship.

Outcome measures

Primary

  • Feasibility: Enrollment

    Feasibility will be assessed by examining trial enrollment over the course of 10 months. The trial will be considered feasible if the study enrolls N=60 participants in 10 months, or 100% of the enrollment goal within 10 months. Thus, enrollment will be assessed by measuring the percentage of the enrollment goal at the end of 10 months.

    Time frame: 10 months

  • Feasibility: Attrition

    Feasibility will be assessed by examining attrition. Attrition will be measured by the percentage of participants who drop out of the study. The intervention will be considered feasible if \>80% of participants complete 6 sessions.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  • Feasibility: Use of intervention strategies

    Feasibility will be assessed by examining participants' use of intervention strategies using a novel measure adapted for this study. Participants will be asked how often they have used the strategies presented in the intervention, with responses ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Every day"). Participants will also be asked about how often they have used each individual strategy or skill with responses ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("6 or more days/week"). The intervention will be considered feasible if ≥75% of participants report use of intervention skills.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  • Acceptability: Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire

    Acceptability will be assessed using the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ). The Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) is a six-item scale assessing whether participants view an intervention as acceptable, ethical, and effective. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (e.g., 1 "very unacceptable" to 7 "very acceptable"). The intervention will be considered acceptable if \>80% of participants rate the intervention as \>5 out of 7 on the TAQ.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  • Acceptability: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Acceptability will be assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ is an 8-item self-report scale to assess participant satisfaction; each item on this scale is scored from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. The intervention will be considered acceptable if \>80% of participants rate the intervention as \>3 out of 4 on the CSQ.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

Secondary

  • Change in risk-based knowledge

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in symptom severity and interference: menopause symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in symptom severity and interference: anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in symptom severity and interference: depression

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in symptom severity and interference: illness intrusiveness

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in decisional conflict

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in self-efficacy: decision self-efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in self-efficacy: self-efficacy for managing symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

  • Change in patient activation

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 weeks

Eligibility criteria

Sex: FemaleAge: 18 Years to 44 YearsHealthy volunteers: No
Inclusion Criteria: * female (biological sex); * 18 to 44 years old; * completed cancer treatment (other than endocrine therapy) \>12 months prior to enrollment; * have not had a period for more than 12 months (amenorrhea); * able to speak and read English. Exclusion Criteria: * diagnosis of metastatic cancer; * visual or hearing impairment that would interfere with participation in study; * cognitive impairment or severe mental illness that would interfere with participation in study.

Study locations (1)

Duke Cancer Institute

Durham, North Carolina, 27705

Recruiting
Michael W Willis · Contact
Smrithi Divakaran · Contact
Rebecca Shelby, PhD · Principal Investigator