The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Summary
The Vanguard Study is a feasibility study to explore several aspects of evaluating multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests in a future definitive randomized controlled trial. An MCD test measures markers in the blood in order to screen for multiple cancers simultaneously. There is a need to understand how MCDs may work as cancer screening tools. The goal of cancer screening is to reduce the burden of cancer by identifying cancers before they show symptoms or signs, when treatment is likely to be most effective. In this study, adults aged 45-75 without cancer will be randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: 2 separate MCD test groups or a control group. These two MCD tests will not be compared to each other but will be compared to cancers detected in the control group. This study will provide early information on how well MCD tests perform as cancer screening tools. It will also help researchers understand how patients and their doctors make decisions about their care when the MCD test result comes back as normal (negative) or abnormal (positive).
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the feasibility of recruitment and adherence to protocol-required baseline and follow-up data and blood collection. II. Assess the feasibility of achieving representative enrollment across participating recruitment sites. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the impact of participant blinding on willingness to participate, adherence to protocol required baseline and follow-up data, blood collection, and rates of standard of care screening. II. To determine the timeliness of returning test results to participants. III. To understand the factors contributing to lack of diagnostic resolution of an abnormal MCD test. IV. To examine the effects of participant characteristics, including cancer risk factors and social determinants of health, on all aspects of feasibility. V. To estimate the proportion of participants receiving an MCD test outside of the trial. VI. To assess the feasibility of a staggered introduction of the second MCD assay intervention arm. VII. To estimate the proportion of abnormal MCD tests that are diagnostically resolved, and the time to resolution. VIII. To compare the proportion of participants who receive standard of care screening during follow-up between the intervention and control arms. IX. To assess the accuracy of tissue of origin prediction for each MCD assay. X. To estimate the incidence of complications related to diagnostic evaluation of an abnormal MCD test result. XI. To assess the effect of an abnormal MCD test and diagnostic workup on anxiety and cancer worry. XII. To evaluate the clinical diagnostic performance of the MCD assays. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate rates of late-stage cancer, and the distribution of cancer stage. II. To estimate assay-targeted cancer-specific mortality of each MCD assay, all cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality. III. To develop preliminary estimates of the total and incremental budget impact of MCD testing compared to current screening practice from the payor perspective. IV. To develop preliminary estimates of the economic burden and impact of MCD testing from the participant perspective. V. To assess the willingness of participants who reported military service to describe military-related environmental exposures by completing the Military Exposure Questionnaire. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. ARM I: Participants undergo blood collection for Shield MCD testing at enrollment and after one year on study. Participants at unblinded sites are provided results of tests and those with abnormal results follow up with their clinician for additional testing. Participants at blinded sites are provided abnormal results and will follow up with their clinician for additional testing. ARM II: Participants undergo blood collection for Avantect MCD testing at enrollment and after one year on study. Participants at unblinded sites are provided results of tests and those with abnormal results follow up with their clinician for additional testing. Participants at blinded sites are provided abnormal results and will follow up with their clinician for additional testing. ARM III (Control): Participants undergo blood collection at enrollment and after one year on study. After completion of study intervention, participants are followed passively up to 10 years.
Arms & interventions
- ProcedureBiospecimen Collection
Undergo blood collection
- DeviceDevice Usage
Evaluation of MCD tests
- OtherElectronic Health Record Review
Obtain health data
- ProcedureMulti-Cancer Detection Test
Undergo Shield MCD test
- ProcedureMulti-Cancer Detection Test
Undergo Avantect MCD test
- OtherQuestionnaire Administration
Study specific questionnaires
Outcome measures
Primary
Feasibility of enrollment onto study
The number of participants enrolled into the study compared to trial goals.
Time frame: At time of randomization
Proportion of participants who complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires within 60 days of receipt
The proportion of participants who are complete questionnaires and timing of completion.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of participants who provide the required blood sample for year 1 for Multi-Cancer Detection (MCD) testing within 90 days of recommended time point
The proportion of participants who have a second blood draw and the timing of the blood draw.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Proportion of participants considered lost to follow-up within 2 years of randomization
The proportion of participants who do not complete study procedures and are not able to be contacted.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Representative enrollment
Meeting or exceeding the trial enrollment goals on a population basis.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Staggered start of intervention arm 2
Advantages and challenges arising from trial activation with one intervention arm and later addition of a second intervention arm.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Secondary
Impact of participant blinding
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Timely return of MCD test result
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Factors contributing to lack of diagnostic resolution of an abnormal MCD test
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Contamination
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Effects of participant characteristics
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Diagnostic resolution following an abnormal MCD test result
Time frame: Within 12 months following an abnormal MCD test result
Time to diagnostic resolution
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Participation in standard of care screening
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Accuracy of tissue of origin prediction
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Complications related to diagnostic evaluation of an abnormal MCD test result
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Anxiety and Cancer Worry Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Sensitivity of clinical diagnostic performance of each MCD assay
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Specificity of each MCD assay
Time frame: 1 year
Test positive rates
Time frame: Up to 2 years
False positives
Time frame: Up to 2 years
(Targeted cancer) Positive predictive value (PPV)
Time frame: Up to 2 years
(All cancer) PPV
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Interval cancers
Time frame: 1 year
Detected cancers
Time frame: 1 year
(Targeted cancer) Negative predictive value
Time frame: 1 year
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (37)
Kaiser Permanente-Division of Research
Pleasanton, California, 94588
Keefe Memorial Hospital
Cheyenne Wells, Colorado, 80810
Kaiser Permanente-Franklin
Denver, Colorado, 80205
Poudre Valley Hospital
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524
Cancer Care and Hematology-Fort Collins
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
UCHealth Greeley Hospital
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
Kaiser Permanente-Rock Creek
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026
Kaiser Permanente-Lone Tree
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Medical Center of the Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, 80538
Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819
Henry Ford Cancer Institute-Downriver
Brownstown, Michigan, 48183
Henry Ford Health Center - Brownstown
Brownstown, Michigan, 48183
Henry Ford Health Center - Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital-Clinton Township
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038
Henry Ford Medical Center-Fairlane
Dearborn, Michigan, 48126
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Henry Ford Medical Center - Detroit Northwest
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
Henry Ford Medical Center-Cottage
Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan, 48236
Henry Ford Medical Center - Livonia
Livonia, Michigan, 48150
Henry Ford Medical Center-Columbus
Novi, Michigan, 48377
Henry Ford Medical Center - Plymouth
Plymouth, Michigan, 48170
Henry Ford Medical Center - Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48067
Henry Ford Medical Center
Sterling Heights, Michigan, 48310
Henry Ford Medical Center - Troy
Troy, Michigan, 48083
Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital
West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48322
Henry Ford Wyandotte Hospital
Wyandotte, Michigan, 48192
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Sentara Martha Jefferson Hospital
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Inova Fair Oaks Hospital
Fairfax, Virginia, 22033
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
VCU Massey Cancer Center at Stony Point
Richmond, Virginia, 23235
VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
VCU Community Memorial Health Center
South Hill, Virginia, 23970