Building on Trust: Navigating Preventive Lung, Breast, and Prostate Cancer Screenings at Community Resource Spots
Summary
To evaluate a community-based outreach initiative for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast, lung, and prostate cancers in underserved adults using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation science framework.
Arms & interventions
- Behavioralreferral for definitive diagnosis based on their cancer screening results
Need for radiological diagnosis
- BehavioralEngagement
Engage in stakeholder focus groups to provide feedback about program operations
Outcome measures
Primary
The categorization of the RE-AIM model dimensions of Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance,
Reach will assess the percentage and characteristics of patients screened or excluded, as well as participant versus non-participant profiles. Effectiveness will measure the proportion of positive screens referred for confirmatory diagnostics and compare screening rates to Healthy People 2030 goals. Adoption will track provider education on breast, lung, and prostate cancer screening guidelines, uptake of screening practices, and staff engagement with navigation programs. Implementation will evaluate referrals to navigation, screening rates, and for positive screens: referral time, diagnostic barriers, treatment uptake, and clinical trial screening. Maintenance will examine primary outcomes at three months, progress toward HP2030 goals, attrition rates, and differences by patient characteristics.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the 3 month follow-up for a total of 12 months
Secondary
PROMIS Global Health (HR-QoL) scale
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the 3 month follow-up for a total of 12 months
Patient Satisfaction with Logistical Aspects of Navigation Scale (PSN-L)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the 3 month follow-up for a total of 12 months
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (1)
Adventhealth
Orlando, Florida, 32804
References
- Kumar AJ, Banco D, Steinberger EE, Chen J, Weidner R, Makim S, Parsons SK. Time to diagnostic resolution after an uncertain screening mammogram in an underserved population. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3252-3258. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2970. Epub 2020 Mar 11.(PubMed)
- Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 13;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2938-8.(PubMed)
- Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. Epub 2009 Jun 19.(PubMed)
- Carle AC, Jean-Pierre P, Winters P, Valverde P, Wells K, Simon M, Raich P, Patierno S, Katz M, Freund KM, Dudley D, Fiscella K. Psychometric evaluation of the patient satisfaction with logistical aspects of navigation (PSN-L) scale using item response theory. Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):354-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000089.(PubMed)
- Chen M, Wu VS, Falk D, Cheatham C, Cullen J, Hoehn R. Patient Navigation in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 May;26(5):504-537. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01514-9. Epub 2024 Apr 6.(PubMed)
- Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101
- Bell-Brown A, Watabayashi K, Delaney D, Carlos RC, Langer SL, Unger JM, Vaidya RR, Darke AK, Hershman DL, Ramsey SD, Shankaran V. Assessment of financial screening and navigation capabilities at National Cancer Institute community oncology clinics. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Aug 31;7(5):pkad055. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad055.(PubMed)