Effectiveness of a Multilevel Integrated Intervention for LDCT Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Among African Americans
Summary
This study aims to reduce disparities and the burden of lung cancer among African American smokers by supporting a Multiple-level intervention integrating lung cancer screening and smoking cessation (MILS), followed the NIH DEIA strategies using multilevel interventions that impact determinants of health and address health disparities at appropriate time points across the life course.
Detailed description
African Americans have both the highest incidence and mortality of lung cancer compared to any other racial/ethnic group. A possible explanation for this disparity is that African Americans (AA) may be less likely to utilize preventative screenings such as Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), which has the potential to encourage smokers to quit smoking successfully. In 2021, the USPSTF expanded their lung cancer screening (LCS) recommendations to include individuals ages 50-80 years with at least a 20 pack-year history, increasing the number of eligible U.S. adults. While the expanded criteria are expected to increase the number of high-risk individuals eligible for screening and reduce lung cancer mortality, the impact on racial and ethnic minorities, including African Americans, has shown mixed findings. This is problematic as previous research has found that African Americans may have different quit behaviors than whites. While use of LCS as a teachable moment for tobacco cessation is important, currently, there is no well- integrated, comprehensive, culturally relevant community-engaged, sustainable program. Still, it is not clear whether the synergy effect of smoking cessation and LDCT LCS intervention was observed in both quitting behaviors and LDCT uptake among African-American smokers. To address this urgent public health concern, this study aims to reduce disparities and the burden of lung cancer among AA smokers by supporting a Multiple-level intervention integrating lung cancer screening and smoking cessation(MILS), followed the NIH DEIA strategies using multilevel interventions that impact determinants of health and address health disparities at appropriate time points across the life course. Aim 1) Investigate smokers' and providers' attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with the expanded 2021 USPSTF LCS recommendations. Aim 2) Compare the effectiveness of a MILS vs. usual care on the biochemically-validated 7-day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence rates, LDCT uptake, nicotine dependence and stage of change was assessed. Aim 3) Explore barriers and facilitators that influence primary outcomes at the community, provider, and individual levels for the improvement of a multilevel intervention. To date, no study has evaluated the synergy effect of smoking cessation intervention and LDCT LCS in AA populations with multilevel strategies. We will move the field forward by providing effective, scalable interventions to improve both smoking cessation and LDCT lung cancer screening adherence to reduce health disparities promised by large clinical trials that motivated screening guidelines. The results of the study will directly guide the development of targeted strategies to improve lung cancer screening rates among minorities.
Arms & interventions
- BehavioralSmoking cessation multilevel Intervention
The intervention will utilize a multilevel intervention based on the Social Ecological Model's individual, institutional, and community levels.
Outcome measures
Primary
Stage of Change for Smoking Cessation
Stage of change in smoking cessation behavior
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up
7-Day Point Prevalence Abstinence Rate
Proportion of participants reporting no smoking in the past 7 days
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up
24-Hour Point Prevalence Abstinence Rate
Proportion of participants reporting no smoking in the past 24 hours
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up
Daily Cigarette Consumption
Number of cigarettes smoked per day
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up
Nicotine Dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence)
Nicotine dependence measured using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), range 0-10, higher scores indicate greater dependence
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up
Secondary
Lung Cancer Screening (LDCT) Uptake
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months
Intent to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening
Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (2)
LSUHSC School of Public Health
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
University Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
References
- Ahmad, A., & Singh, J. (2022). Influence of Processes of Change on Stages of Change for Smoking Cessation. Journal of Applied Social Science, 16(1), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244211036994 Andritsou, M., Schoretsaniti, S., Litsiou, E., Saltagianni, V., Konstadara, K., Spiliotopoulou, A., Zakynthinos, S., & Katsaounou, P. (2016). Success rates are correlated mainly to completion of a smoking cessation program. European Respiratory Journal, 48. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA4599 Baker, T. B., Burris, J. L., & Fiore, M. C. (2022). Helping African American individuals quit smoking: Finally, some progress. JAMA, 327(22), 2192-2194. Baker, T. B., Mermelstein, R., Collins, L. M., Piper, M. E., Jorenby, D. E., Smith, S. S., Christiansen, B. A., Schlam, T. R., Cook, J. W., & Fiore, M. C. (2011). New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41(2), pp.192-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9252-y Collins, L. M., Baker, T. B., Mermelstein, R. J., Piper, M. E., Jorenby, D. E., Smith, S. S., ... & Fiore, M. C. (2011). The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41(2), pp.208-226. Cornelius, M. E., Loretan, C. G., Jamal, A., Lynn, B. C. D., Mayer, M., Alcantara, I. C., & Neff, L. (2023). Tobacco Product Use Among Adults-United States, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(18), pg.475. Etter, J. F., Vu Duc, T., & Perneger, T. V. (1999). Validity of the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence and of the Heaviness of Smoking Index among relatively light smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 94(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1360-0443.1999.94226910.X Fedewa, S. A., Kazerooni, E. A., Studts, J. L., Smith, R. A., Bandi, P., Sauer, A. G., ... & Silvestri, G. A. (2021). State variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 113(