Biofield Therapy for the Support of Immunotherapy-related Symptoms Among Adult Cancer Patients - A Pilot Study
Summary
Cancer treatment with immunotherapy is often associated with symptoms such as fatigue, pain, and emotional distress, which may affect patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Additional supportive care approaches are being studied to better understand their potential role in supporting these symptoms. The purpose of this study is to learn whether a biofield therapy, called Reiki may help to support adults with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy and currently struggling with fatigue. Reiki is a non-invasive complementary therapy delivered by a trained practitioner who places their hands lightly near the body. It is intended to promote relaxation and support general well-being. Reiki is used as a supportive practice and is not considered a medical treatment or replacement for standard care. The secondary goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of delivering Reiki in this clinical setting. This includes examining recruitment, retention, adherence to study procedures, and overall participant engagement. Lastly, the third aim is to explore participants' experiences with Reiki through guided interviews. Participants enrolled in this study will first be asked to participate in a one-hour, one-on-one interview about their experiences with cancer treatment, their symptoms, and their thoughts about integrative care practices such as Reiki. After the interview, they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Immediate Reiki Group: If participants are assigned to this group, they will receive six weekly, in-person 30-minute Usui Reiki sessions from a Reiki master at the Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute. Before and after each session, participants will complete questionnaires about fatigue, pain, and stress. At the first and final sessions, a small blood sample will be collected to measure inflammatory biomarkers, and Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning will be conducted to measure brain activity and connectivity between the participant and the practitioner. Four weeks after the final session, they will complete the questionnaires again, followed by a short satisfaction survey about their experience. Waitlist Group: If they are assigned to the waitlist group, they will first complete a 6-week observation period that includes brief weekly fatigue questionnaires and two in-person 30-minute sessions with EEG measurements at Week 1 and Week 6. This will be followed by a 4-week period with no sessions, after which they will complete questionnaires about fatigue, pain, and psychological distress. Participants will then begin the same six weekly, in-person 30-minute sessions described above. As with the Immediate Group, they will complete questionnaires before and after each session. At the first and final sessions, a small blood sample will be collected and EEG hyperscanning will be conducted. At the end of the study, participants will also complete a short satisfaction survey about their experience. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving Reiki will report improvements in symptoms and well-being compared to those not yet receiving Reiki, and that the intervention will be feasible to implement and acceptable to participants.
Arms & interventions
- OtherUsui Reiki Intervention
This study evaluates a standardized Usui Reiki intervention delivered by a trained Reiki Master (Level III). Participants will receive six weekly, in-person sessions, each lasting approximately 30 minutes, in a quiet clinical setting. During each session, participants rest in a reclined position with minimal sensory stimulation (e.g., optional blindfold and earplugs), while the practitioner places their hands just above the body at standardized positions. The intervention is structured to ensure consistency across participants, including fixed session frequency, duration, and a single trained practitioner. It is implemented in patients undergoing active immunotherapy and includes multimodal assessments, such as patient-reported outcomes, electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements, and blood-based biomarkers collected at specified time points to explore potential clinical and biological effects.
Outcome measures
Primary
Change in Fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form Total Score)
Fatigue will be assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF), a validated self-report questionnaire measuring general, physical, emotional, and mental fatigue, as well as vigor. Scores will be used to evaluate changes in fatigue severity over time. Total scores range from -24 to 96, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome).
Time frame: Before and after each of the 6 weekly Reiki sessions
Change in Pain
Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain (higher scores = worse outcome)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to Week 6 of the intervention arm (before and after each Reiki session)
Secondary
Change in Psychological Distress
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to Week 6 of the intervention arm (before and after each Reiki session).
Inter-Brain Coherence Between Patient and Practitioner
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 6 of each arm
Change in Inflammatory Biomarkers (Cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-alpha) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels)
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 6 of the intervention arm
Eligibility criteria
Study locations (2)
UCI Health Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute
Irvine, California, 92617
UCI Health
Orange, California, 92868
References
- Vitale A. An integrative review of Reiki touch therapy research. Holist Nurs Pract. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):167-79; quiz 180-1. doi: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000280927.83506.f6.(PubMed)
- Miles P, True G. Reiki--review of a biofield therapy history, theory, practice, and research. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;9(2):62-72.(PubMed)
- Thrane S, Cohen SM. Effect of Reiki therapy on pain and anxiety in adults: an in-depth literature review of randomized trials with effect size calculations. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Dec;15(4):897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.07.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.(PubMed)
- Tsang KL, Carlson LE, Olson K. Pilot crossover trial of Reiki versus rest for treating cancer-related fatigue. Integr Cancer Ther. 2007 Mar;6(1):25-35. doi: 10.1177/1534735406298986.(PubMed)
- Birocco N, Guillame C, Storto S, Ritorto G, Catino C, Gir N, Balestra L, Tealdi G, Orecchia C, Vito GD, Giaretto L, Donadio M, Bertetto O, Schena M, Ciuffreda L. The effects of Reiki therapy on pain and anxiety in patients attending a day oncology and infusion services unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Jun;29(4):290-4. doi: 10.1177/1049909111420859. Epub 2011 Oct 13.(PubMed)
- Zucchetti G, Candela F, Bottigelli C, Campione G, Parrinello A, Piu P, Vassallo E, Fagioli F. The Power of Reiki: Feasibility and Efficacy of Reducing Pain in Children With Cancer Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;36(5):361-368. doi: 10.1177/1043454219845879. Epub 2019 May 3.(PubMed)
- vanderVaart S, Gijsen VM, de Wildt SN, Koren G. A systematic review of the therapeutic effects of Reiki. J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Nov;15(11):1157-69. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0036.(PubMed)
- McManus DE. Reiki Is Better Than Placebo and Has Broad Potential as a Complementary Health Therapy. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017 Oct;22(4):1051-1057. doi: 10.1177/2156587217728644. Epub 2017 Sep 5.(PubMed)
- Gonella S, Garrino L, Dimonte V. Biofield therapies and cancer-related symptoms: a review. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Oct;18(5):568-76. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.568-576.(PubMed)
- Sayer M, Agrawal P, Ng DQ, Kagramanov D, Trudeau J, Othy S, Acharya MM, Chan A. Incidence and predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-related cognitive impairment in a racial and ethnic diverse population. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 2;33(6):523. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09560-0.(PubMed)
- Thompson JA. New NCCN Guidelines: Recognition and Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicity. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):594-596. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0047.(PubMed)
- Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J, Jordan K; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225. No abstract available.(PubMed)
- Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, Chau I, Davies MJ, Ernstoff MS, Fecher L, Ghosh M, Jaiyesimi I, Mammen JS, Naing A, Nastoupil LJ, Phillips T, Porter LD, Reichner CA, Seigel C, Song JM, Spira A, Suarez-Almazor M, Swami U, Thompson JA, Vikas P, Wang Y, Weber JS, Funchain P, Bollin K. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 20;39(36):4073-4126. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01440. Epub 2021 Nov 1.(PubMed)
- Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):158-168. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481. No abstract available.(PubMed)
- Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Impact and Mechanisms of Response and Resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 2021 Jan 24;16:223-249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741. Epub 2020 Nov 16.(PubMed)